About The Blog

Debate at the intersection of business, technology and culture in the world of digital identity, both commercial and government, a blog born from the Digital Identity Forum in London and sponsored by Consult Hyperion

Advertisers

Technorati

  • Add to
Technorati Favorites

License

  • Creative Commons

    Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

    Please note that by replying in this Forum you agree to license your comments in the same way. Your comments may be edited and used but will always be attributed.

« Working digital identities in the corporate space | Main | No, not more innovation »

Hope I d..d..die before I get old

By davebirch posted Mar 3 2007 at 9:19 AM

[Dave Birch] I see privacy as an important component of a national identity management scheme, even though I'd be hard pressed to describe exactly what I mean by it.  But is this because I'm a technologically well-informed and socially-aware person or because I'm an idealistic old fart?  I'm thinking it may be the latter, remembering that "the kids don't care... because only old people like you and me suffer from the illusion of privacy these days."  This is more than a flippant dismissal of a serious concern, it's part of the generation "I" world view, and I'll be writing some more about this shortly.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

My first reaction is that I refuse to take this fatalism lying down, especially when technology can deliver so much better options and possibilities.  I think that at the heart of a digital identity scheme for "the masses" must be a set of principles (Kim Cameron's laws, for example) that set the bar higher than the Scott McNealy's 1999 statement that "you have zero privacy anyway, get over it" approach.

I don't want to bore people by chanting the same mantra, but the fact is that digital identity management can deliver more security and more privacy, and that seems counterintuitive to most people and therefore its difficult to explain.  I have to try and find some new ways to present this to non-specialists (such as civil servants and their management consultants).

My opinions are my own (I think) and are presented solely in my capacity as an interested member of the general public.
[posted with ecto]

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.