About The Blog

Debate at the intersection of business, technology and culture in the world of digital identity, both commercial and government, a blog born from the Digital Identity Forum in London and sponsored by Consult Hyperion



  • Add to
Technorati Favorites


  • Creative Commons

    Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

    Please note that by replying in this Forum you agree to license your comments in the same way. Your comments may be edited and used but will always be attributed.

« Is it spam if I keep saying it? | Main | Virtual identity theft or identity virtual theft or identity theft virtually? »

Dreaming spires, etc

By davebirch posted May 15 2007 at 8:27 AM

[Dave Birch] I was thinking about my day out at the Forum Oxford conference on Future Technologies, in Oxford. I won't go over all of the presentations since you can go via Forum Oxford to pick them up (and get involved in the discussion) but they did provide food for thought and I appreciate Ajit and Tomi's efforts to create a novel kind of cross-media "watering hole" for those of us kindly referred to as "opinon formers" in their introduction.

Technorati Tags: ,

I agree with most of the speakers and delegates that this is all very exciting: the collision between mobile and web 2.0 does, I'm sure, offer many new possibilities.  But surely something has to happen: the identity and authentication problem has to be overcome in order to realise the potential.  In this space, though, the identity and authentication problem has a different construction because of the role of the mobile operator and the components in the handset.  One can envisage the operator providing authentication (and quite strong authentication at that, because it could be based on location as well as PIN and passwords) for third-party identification services, or one can envisage the operator providing a bundled identification and authentication service that works something like the one demonstrated by Gemalto and Sun at Cartes last year.  In either case, the ISP in the fixed internet world is not really an analogue of the mobile operator.

Anyway, I was thinking that the position of the mobile handset as the basis of practical identity management in the real world is becoming unassailable.  As Neil McEvoy points out in yesterday's podcast, it passes all of the tests: it's portable, has secure storage, has its own keyboard for PIN entry and so on.  But as the discussions about NFC have shown, it is controlled by the mobile operators, so people who want better identification and authentication to be used by "ordinary" people (ie, not nerds like me) such as governments and banks will end up having to cut a deal with them.  But why wouldn't they prefer to pay the operator a penny every time you log on to your home banking if it saves them millions and millions in development costs, operating costs and fraud?

These opinions are my own (I think) and are presented solely in my capacity as an interested member of the general public [posted with ecto]


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dreaming spires, etc:

» The Blog from The Blog
Provides extranet privacy to clients making a range of tests and surveys available to their [url=http://ixahagi.info/Ml8zNTA2OA==]human[/url] resources departments. [Read More]


The comments to this entry are closed.