Blookseller
By davebirch posted Oct 31 2007 at 6:27 PMTechnorati Tags: forum, identity, management
Debate at the intersection of business, technology and culture in the world of digital identity, both commercial and government, a blog born from the Digital Identity Forum in London and sponsored by Consult Hyperion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Please note that by replying in this Forum you agree to license your comments in the same way. Your comments may be edited and used but will always be attributed.
« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »
Technorati Tags: forum, identity, management
Technorati Tags: identity, privacy, rfid, security, social networking
Technorati Tags: business, identity, management
Continue reading "Identity management in a big organisation" »
Technorati Tags: government, identity, privacy
Continue reading "Will they have to write to everyone in the entire country?" »
My L.L.P. would have its own mailing address, its own tax ID number, and that’s the information I’d give when I’m online.. The author of the Times article, Denise Caruso quotes Drummond Reed as well:
The myth is that companies have to know all this information about you in order to do business with you ... [b]ut from a liability perspective, the less I know about my customers the better.Or, as Forum friend and former editor of Wired UK John Browning wrote a decade ago (in Wired 5.11)
The true identity of a counterparty may be the least interesting fact about them in a commercial transaction.Drummond's point is made form the perspective from the U.S. National Retail Federation open letter to the credit card industry asking them to stop putting retailers on "the horns of a dilemma" by requiring them to store personal data, but then turning around and penalizing them when that data gets compromised. The LLP idea aims to help by giving retailers (and everyone else, of course) help to protect individuals by giving those individuals identities which contain only a limited amount of personal information (I don't see why companies would have LLPs as well though). If this sounds familiar, and I sound uncritical, that's because this is one of our PET projects: but we don't call them LLPs (I prefer to shy away from the word "liability") but pseudonymous virtual identities, and they solve more problems than PCI-DSS compliance.
Technorati Tags: identity, management, PKI, security
a single overarching term (such as identity theft) is here to stay, and the label preferred by our government is now codified into use from the office of President on down.I agree with them that, whatever the language, we need to avoid bundling account takeover and the like with "simple" card fraud -- which is why the suggestion of "identity fraud" and "card fraud" seems reasonable and because (as was discussed at last years' Digital Identity Forum, "identity theft" doesn't really mean anything) -- but no-one has yet come up with a good catch-all term to cover both of these. As an aside, there's always post-modern ironic identity theft, which ought to be special category in its own right. Anyhow, whatever you call it, it's back in the news again because British MPs have called for an Identity Czar to be appointed (presumably because the whole Drug Czar thing worked out so well).