Debate at the intersection of business, technology and culture in the world of digital identity, both commercial and government, a blog born from the Digital Identity Forum in London and sponsored by Consult Hyperion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Please note that by replying in this Forum you agree to license your comments in the same way. Your comments may be edited and used but will always be attributed.
« October 2007 | Main | December 2007 »
Technorati Tags: identity, management, privacy
I truly believe that someone paid for information to be stolen.He must be wrong. Why would criminals steal the CDs (which someone might eventually notice were missing) rather than steal the data? Frank is confusing the Hollywood MacGuffin-led version of data theft -- in which the master criminal / CIA / international terrorist gang chases the hero around the world to destroy a disk containing top secret evidence of a conspiracy, apparently unware that you can e-mail the data from one place to another rather than transporting it as atoms (as were Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, it seems) -- with real-world risk analysis. In Frank's film version, the plot might be that the criminals disguised themselves as couriers, bluffed their way past the front desk, took the packages, found the one with the CDs in, stole it, changed clothes to pretend to be HMRC clerks and then gave the rest of the packages to the real courier. In my film version, some wally has put the package in the wrong bin and it's gone into landfill. But just suppose...
Technorati Tags: identity
Technorati Tags: identity, management
[Dave Birch] As I've constantly complained, what should one do if one is (broadly speaking) in favour of some form of smart identity card to bridge the worlds of physical and virtual identity, but one is (broadly speaking) against the government's proposed system? Well, one policy might be to stop reading the newspapers and hope it will all get better. Consider, for example, the Department of Work and Pensions' attempt to salvage a viable system from the Child Support Agency catastrophe, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC), which adds several sticks to beat recalcitrant parents with. There is going to be a 'name and shame' web site, credit blacklisting, monitored curfews (possible including electronic tagging) and the confiscation of passport and/or ID card. That's joined-up government at work, presumably. The Child Maintenance & Other Payments Bill includes powers for the CMEC to disqualify an individual from "holding or obtaining travel authorisation", with a travel authorisation being defined as a UK passport or as "an ID card... that... has been issued to a British citizen." This kind of predictable -- and tragic (in the sense of inevitable) -- mission creep is an consequence of an ill-thought out identity infrastructure that is not up to the demands of a modern society or modern economy. And even if you think that taking away some ID-related privilege is the right thing to do to a deadbeat Dad, the use of the word "confiscation" reveals the basic mindset problem: "they" won't stop you from renewing a public key certificate, delete an application from the card, change a security level or anything else that might smack of the 21st century, "they" will confiscate the card. Hey, Parliament, I've got 1952 on the line and they want their ID card back...
Technorati Tags: ID cards, management
Technorati Tags: community, identity, management, privacy, smart cards, social networking
Technorati Tags: biometrics, identity