About The Blog

Debate at the intersection of business, technology and culture in the world of digital money, both commercial and government, a blog born from the Digital Money Forum in London and sponsored by Consult Hyperion



  • Add to
Technorati Favorites


  • Creative Commons

    Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

    Please note that by replying in this Forum you agree to license your comments in the same way. Your comments may be edited and used but will always be attributed.

« Quasi-bank account? | Main | Disruptive or just different? »

When Monopoly money was real

By davebirch posted Jun 12 2007 at 7:34 AM
[Dave Birch] We think about money as a law of nature, as a kind of constant, but the way that money works today is not only just one of many ways in which it could work, it's a relatively recent invention in the great scheme of things. It wasn't that long ago that the developed world was on a commodity standard (ie, gold) and there was no national fiat currency. Seventy five years ago, in America, there wasn't even a circulating medium of exchange. At the height of the Great Depression, 1932 and 1933, when the interest rate on U.S. Treasury bills was negative, unemployment was 25 percent and bank runs and closings were common, Americans reverted to barter.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

It's hard to imagine now, but this is a time when the U.S.A. literally ran out of money. In his first week in office in 1933, FDR passed legislation to enforce bank holidays, end the convertability of gold and to force the population of to sell their gold to the Federal government. It's surprising, I think, to Europeans to realise just how much passion these events still stir today: there are no end of books, magazines, pamphlets and web sites that still refer to FDR's actions then as if they were yesterday, and not all of them come from guys living on the top of mountains in West Virginia (ie, the guys who think that the Federal Reserve is a Jewish conspiracy).

Anyway, the point is this. Because there was no cash -- no Federal Reserve notes -- available, people began to print their own money. This is known as "scrip" and it is by no means limited to this single historical case: it's a common phenomenon. An often-used example closer to home comes from the Irish bank strike in 1966, when people in Ireland wrote personal cheques to each and these were then passed on to form a cash substitute. British Postal Orders circulate on the Indian subcontinent performing a similar function.

The "depression scrip" issued around America took many forms (there is a vibrant collectors' market for this: just search on eBay) and was issued by communities, companies and individuals.

As Forum friend Bernard Lietaer points out in this 1990 article, Dean Acheson, then Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, had been approached by Professor Irving Fisher with the idea of scrip with a high "negative interest" rate (2% per week) and was calculated so that the face value would be amortised over one year, and the currency withdrawn at that point. Acheson decided to have it checked by his economic advisor, Professor Russell Sprague at Harvard. The answer was that it would work, but that it had some implications for decentralised decision making which Acheson should verify in Washington. By this time, the "stamp scrip movement" as it became known, had created interest by no less than 450 cities around the United States. For example the City of St. Louis, Missouri, had decided to issue $100,000 worth of stamp money. Similarly, Oregon was planning to launch a $75 million stamp scrip issue. A federal law had been introduced in Congress by Congressman Pettengil, Indiana, to issue $ l billion of stamped currency. Fisher published a little handbook entitled "Stamp Scrip" for practical management of this currency by communities, and described the actual experience of 75 American communities with it. It looked as if the U.S. might adopt a decentralised money system, but on 4th March 1933 Roosevelt announced the New Deal and, in addition to closing the banks, prohibited the issue of "emergency currencies". The experiment was over.

What's the point of this post? Well, I happened to be reading "Monopoly: The World's Most Famous Game and How It Got That Way" by Philip Orbanes and it mentions in passing that in 1933, Parker Brothers used their printing presses to print scrip that was accepted in their home town of Salem, Mass. Games to the rescue! I wonder if next time the banks fail, it will be World of Warcraft gold, not Monopoly money, that stands in for fiat currency!

These opinions are my own (I think) and presented solely in my capacity as an interested member of the general public [posted with ecto]


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference When Monopoly money was real:

» Money Rates from Money Rates
Advertisement For Golden Eagle Money Market, Silver Eagle Money Market, [Read More]


> I wonder if next time the banks fail, it will be World of Warcraft gold, not Monopoly money, that stands in for fiat currency!

This happened recently in Russia. When the banking system failed recently, WebMoney was there to provide an alternate. Now it is entrenched in that world in much the same way as Paypal is, but with a far better pedigree.

The comments to this entry are closed.