About The Blog

Debate at the intersection of business, technology and culture in the world of digital money, both commercial and government, a blog born from the Digital Money Forum in London and sponsored by Consult Hyperion

Advertisers

Technorati

  • Add to
Technorati Favorites

License

  • Creative Commons

    Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

    Please note that by replying in this Forum you agree to license your comments in the same way. Your comments may be edited and used but will always be attributed.

« Out of Africa | Main | Opportunity knocks »

Laundry bills

By Dave Birch posted Jun 19 2008 at 9:44 PM
[Dave Birch] I'm looking at the tension between financial inclusion and KYC/AML (financial exclusion), specifically in the context of launching new mobile payment schemes in developing countries. My thinking is summed up well here:

Strict KYC norms present a big hurdle: The very people who have most to gain from mobile banking are excluded because they don't have identity cards, proof of address and other credentials.

One way to deal with this problem would be to allow ``KYC- lite'' that restricts the amounts per transaction to minimize risks while ensuring that the poor aren't left out.

[From Bloomberg.com: Opinion]
I've argued before -- in other fora -- for a much stronger KYC/AML break at the low end of the market since it would provide a low-cost means to improve the lives of a large number of the poorest people. The main argument against this, naturally, is that the break might then be exploited by criminals, terrorists and so on. I don't buy this at all, but do need to address it.

I'm curious as to whether all of the expenditure on KYC/AML makes the slightest difference to crime or terrorism. Can anyone point me to any reputable source of data that shows the crime reduction versus expenditure curve in this area? Are there any major terrorist incidents that have been averted? Have the authorities used KYC or AML effectively to catch major criminals (not just people like Elliott Spitzer).

These opinions are my own (I think) and presented solely in my capacity as an interested member of the general public [posted with ecto]

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fd753ef00e553613dcb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Laundry bills:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.